시카고, 3. - 10 월 4 일 시카고 국제 협의회 (CCGA) 오찬에서 이코노미스트 편집장 지니 민턴 베드도스의 등장은 신중하게 처리되었다. Windy City의 빅박스 미디어가 브렉시트 Brexit에 대해 적시에 침묵을 표했다는 사실 외에도, 영향력이 큰 CCGA는 그녀를 국제주의 출판사의 수장으로 소개하는 데 신중했습니다. 그러나 빌더버그 강화위원회 Bilderberg Steering Committee의 멤버쉽과 Bilderberg 연례 회의에서의 꾸준한 참석은 언론 독점의 일환으로 초고속 회의에 참석하지만 그러한 회의의 존재에 대한 논문은 그들의 의제를 숨겨줍니다 .
CHICAGO, Ill.-The appearance of Zanny Minton Beddoes, editor-in-chief of The Economist, at a luncheon of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs (CCGA) on Oct. 4, was handled carefully. Besides the fact that the Windy City's big-box media greeted her timely remarks about Brexit with silence, the highly influential CCGA was careful to introduce her as the head of a stridently internationalist publication. There was nary a word, however, about her membership on the Bilderberg Steering Committee and her steady attendance at the annual Bilderberg meetings as part of a media coterie that attends the hyper-exclusive gatherings but papers over the existence of such meetings and masks their agenda.
베드도스 Minton Beddoes는 10 월 31 일 일어날 수있는 유럽 연합으로 영국 탈퇴Brexit 를 내부적으로 살펴보면서 Brexit을 다소 비밀리에 다루었습니다. 그러나오찬에서 그녀가 Brexit의 복잡성을 탐구하면서 이 작가의 주요 질문에 대답하면서 그 가식적 태도는 엄청나게 풀렸다.
Minton Beddoes addressed Brexit rather cryptically, giving an insider's look at the British exit from the European Union that could happen Oct. 31. As she discussed Brexit with CCGA Vice President of Studies Brian Hanson, she adopted a fragile pretense of neutrality that held for much of the luncheon. But that pretense discernably unraveled as she explored Brexit's complexities while responding to a key question from this writer.
브렉시트를 반대하는 기득권층이 꾸준히 회피하고 있는 은밀한 중대 문제를 제기하면서, 이 작가는 영국-유럽 연합군의 성장에 대해 그녀에게 물었다. Brexit는 서류 상의 탈퇴일 뿐이지 만 완전히 완성될 수는 없습니다. 이 작가는 또한 EU의 복잡한 규칙과 규정의 많은 부분이 영국 법률 코드에 통합되었을 때 유럽연합에서 영국을 퇴출시킬 수 있는지 물었다.
Bringing up a hush-hush matter that the anti-Brexit establishment steadfastly avoids, this writer asked her about the growing UK-EU military union-which hardwires the UK into the EU in a prolonged fashion-and inquired whether that union could result in a Brexit that's only an exit on paper, but which cannot be fully consummated. This writer also asked whether it's possible to extricate Britain from the EU when much of the EU's complex body of rules and regulations has been integrated into the British legal code.
영국에서 태어난 편집자의 두 부분으로 된 답변은 서구 언론 대부분과 마찬가지로 빌더버그 조직 Bilderberg에 추종하는 이코노미스트가 Brexit 운동에 대해서 압도적으로 반대했기 때문입니다. 그녀가 객관적 태도를 취하는 걸 반대합니다. 그래서 비정상적인 질문이 있을 때 약간의 균형을 맞추며 Minton Beddoes는 이 문제를 과장하는 경향이 있었습니다. 뭔말인지 욧점을 흐리는 그녀의 말을 보세요,
The British-born editor's reply to the two-part question quickly snowballed and became convoluted, likely because the Bilderberg-aligned Economist, like most of the Western press, is so overwhelmingly opposed to Brexit-despite her noted attempt at objectivity-that establishment editors get a bit off-balance when asked unusual questions. Accordingly, Minton Beddoes tended to overstate the matter.
"양측은 가능한 한 긴밀한 연결을 유지하기 위해 자신의 관심 안에서 그것을 볼 것"이라고 그녀는 주장했다. "그러나 EU는 규칙에 기반을 둔 조직입니다. 그리고 이러한 모든 링크는 영국이 EU의 회원국이라는 근거로 구축되었으며 그 결과 특정 법적 의무와 권리가 있습니다. 만일 우리 영국이 더 이상 회원국이 아니라면 그 의무 권리는 종료됩니다. "
"Both sides will see it within their interest to maintain as close links as possible," she claimed. "But the EU is a rules-based organization. And all of these links have been built up on the basis of the UK being a member state of the EU, as a result of which certain legal obligations and rights come. If we're no longer a member, then that is ended."
트럼프는 경제 비밀무기를 풀어놓는데, 경제를 부양하기 위함
Trump Unleashed An Economic Secret Weapon To Boost The Economy - Episode 2021a https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5AgpvLD_lk
A storm with heavy rainfall, combined with already saturated soil and flood debris, led to the flooding of the village and a total loss of 34 lives.
It has been reported by various sources since 2001 that this catastrophic event was caused by RAF "rainmakers" during ‘Operation Cumulus, that was being carried out during August 1952 by the RAF supported by an international team of scientists.
리차드데이 Richard Day 박사는 록펠러 Rockefeller 내부자였으며 1969 년 펜실베이니아에 있는 소아과 의사들에게 미국과 세계가 세계 계획에 따라 어떻게 변화할 것인지에 대해 이야기했습니다.
그가 말한 것은 사실상 모든 세부 사항에서 정확하다는 것이 입증되었습니다. 데이 박사는 엘리트 네트워크 내에는 공개 도메인의 지식 기반과는 매우 다른 지식기반이 있기 때문에 내부자는 계획된 내용을 알고 있다고 말했다.
Dr Richard Day was a Rockefeller insider, who told a group of paediatricians in Pennsylvania in 1969 how America and the world was going to change in line with a global plan.
What he said has since proved to be correct in virtually every detail. Day said that insiders knew what was planned because there is a knowledge base within the Elite network that is very different to the one in the public domain.
회의에서 녹음하거나 메모하는 것은 금지되었지만 한 청중은 토론의 많은 부분을 기억하고 공개했습니다.
데이는 ‘미래의 테러 사용’,‘인구 통제’,‘개인에게 칩을 심는 마이크로 치핑’ 계획에 이르기까지 다양한 문제를 다루면서``우리는 날씨를 통제할 수있을 것입니다. 그는``나는 이미 존재하는 비를 침전시키기 위해 요오드화물 결정을 구름에 떨어 뜨리는 정도의 것이 아니라 기후에 대한 진정한 통제력을 말하는 것 ''이라고 말했다. 그리고 날씨는 전쟁의 무기, 공공 정책에 영향을 미치는 무기로 여겨졌습니다.
Recording or taking notes at the meeting was forbidden, however one audience member managed to recall and divulge much of the debate.
As well as covering issues ranging from ‘the future use of terrorism' to ‘population control' to ‘the microchipping of persons', Day stated that, ‘We can or soon will be able to control the weather.' He said, ‘I'm not merely referring to dropping iodide crystals into the clouds to precipitate rain that's already there, but REAL control.' And weather was seen as a weapon of war, a weapon of influencing public policy.
Rulers could make rain or withhold rain in order to influence certain areas and bring whole countries under their control.
There were two sides to this that were rather striking. He said, ‘On the one hand you can make drought during the growing season so that nothing will grow, and on the other hand you can make for very heavy rains during harvest season so the fields are too muddy to bring in the harvest, and indeed one might be able to do both.' There was no statement how this would be done. It was stated that either it was already possible or very, very close to being possible [in 1969].
‘THE WAR on TERROR'
During this recent and, perhaps, ongoing period of history many millions of us now understand that the ‘War on Terror' was initiated by the mega-911 event and that the real perpetrators of that event was the international ruling establishment itself, using various arms of its military and Intelligence Services to commit the crime it intended to (and successfully did) blame on innocent parties as a pretext for future military despotic adventurism.
After 9/11 our rulers understood that a ‘war on terror' requires ongoing real terror and they were happy to use their agencies to provide it. Most large terrorist events over the past 18 years have been false-flags and details of the fiendish threats against which our governments were desperately working to defend us FILLED THE PAGES OF THE MASS MEDIA EVERY SINGLE DAY.
‘THE CLIMATE CRISIS'
Greta Thunberg, the 16-year-old leader of a global protest against inaction on climate change, marched at a rally in New York City Friday. Around the world, millions of other people joined her.
Over the past couple of years the threat against which our government must protect us has changed. It is no longer a religious fanatic in a cave in Afghanistan inspiring like-minded Islamic lunatics to try and murder us all. The threat is now the weather-systems of our own planet. The image of Osama Bin Laden has been replaced by the hysterical hallucinations of a 16-year-old Swedish pavement-squatter who knows we are going to kill her and all her young friends if we don't change our behaviour radically NOW.
Uh, oh ... here it comes. EVERY DAY the papers are full of it.
A new unprecedented flood here, unstoppable wildfires there.
Isn't this all a bit ... well ... familiar?
We cannot prove that our rulers are carrying out ‘weather' attacks against us (like we could prove many ‘War on Terror' False Flags from the available evidence) because we have no access to information that is private to military and Intelligence Services contractors.
However, observing the identical format of this new terror template, from honest examination of painful experience, using our own simple God-given common sense ...
... We can know that this is exactly what is going on.
기후 위기 위장작전은 이미 우리에게 와있다
CLIMATE CRISIS FALSE FLAGS ARE ALREADY WITH US.
The ‘War on Terror' has failed to own our minds. Now the Luciferian powers-that-be are weaponising the very planet against us. After this fails all they have left is nuclear strikes to achieve their goal.